SEO'BrienSearch and online marketing with Paul O'Brien |
|
| ||||
| Sign up for a feed or Subscribe by Email | ||||||
SEO'BrienSearch and online marketing with Paul O'Brien |
|
| ||||
| Sign up for a feed or Subscribe by Email | ||||||
August 10, 2007 |
For years, we have all pined over the lack of a comprehensive comparison of analytics platforms from Omniture’s SiteCatalyst, Coremetrics, Visual Sciences’ Hitbox (previously WebSideStory), and Google. Online marketers and web designers have to sit through cumbersome sales pitches and wade through confusing RFPs to decipher which solution is best for them.
No more I say!
Months ago, SEOMoz posted a request for assistance with just such a comparison and they have yet to complete their report so, most importantly, understand that this is no small task. I encourage comments, opinions, and criticisms as my experiences are dated and incomplete. You’ll notice in particular that I’m a little in the dark on Coremetrics so I’m depending on you to help transform this into an accurate report.
Like the previous, highly scientific comparison I’ve done here, this may not be well formated as this is as much a random walk along with my train of thought as it is a structured opinion. As such, you can skip ahead to my very brief conclusion here or brave on! To organize it some way, I’ve been thinking about only the following considerations: Setup & Installation and Features.
Setup & Installation
Expect setup with Omniture, Coremetrics, and Hitbox to take 4-6 weeks. Google is notably faster if tracking only a single domain: add the script to your pages and you’re done. You have no options to consider and are only left with setting up a dashboard of pre-existing reports.
All 4 are hosted, web based applications that depend on javascript tagging of pages. What you have to weigh are the challenges and advantages of each tagging methodology:
Features
Let’s go with a list:
It should be noted that Omniture can be packaged with Search Center which is an exceptional paid search bid management tool and a wonderful enhancement to search analytics.
Clearly, the two topics I avoided are costs and accuracy. Well known amongst those of us that have used web analytics is that no two platforms provide the same answers. An article worth reading which helps explain the issue of accuracy is Bart Gibby’s Omniture SiteCatalyst vs. Google Analytics while StoneTemple Consulting has a deeper review with their 2007 Web Analytics Shootout.
I’m not touching costs other than to remind you that Google is free.
Okay… I’ll gently touch it. Hitbox has always struck me as a more complete package with reports others provide as incremental and optional already setup; with that, and the included training, expect to pay more, upwards of $100k per year. Omniture is a good example of the opposite of Hitbox, initial costs are much lower as you have to pay more for training and customized reports. Don’t be mislead that their costs seem lower, at $25-$50k per year you are getting a bare bones installation and very limited support.
In all cases your costs will depend on your needs and the size of your organization and site.
Have I gone all over the place and left you with more questions than answers? Here’s how I’d summarize your options:
Popularity: 86% [?]
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
5 Comments so far
|
hi i enjoyed the read
[...] that just take the cake? Here I spend a few hours writing up my perspective of the major web analytics platforms only to have a much more comprehensive report released by StoneTemple Consulting shortly [...]
Do you know of any agencies who specialize in building desktop dashboards based on Omniture?
I wish I did Robert, any ideas from the audience? I haven’t even found good Desktop widgets
[...] the same frustration on the same forum asking for a larger set of vendor comparison. This year, SEO’Brien talked about a web analytics project that compared ultimate search engines like Google, Coremetrics [...]